Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
LETTER: We need politicians who believe in greater freedom and liberty
editor's pick

LETTER: We need politicians who believe in greater freedom and liberty

  • 1

Rural Virginia, and indeed rural America, is at a crossroads.

Slow or even declining rates of population growth, an opioid epidemic silently sweeping the country, and a depressed economic outlook brought about by COVID lockdowns are all defining factors of what it means to live in a rural community today.

At the same time, politicians in Washington and Richmond seem to pay less and less attention to the unique needs and challenges facing rural areas with each passing day. An old phrase comes to mind: “No matter how low your opinion of Washington is, it’s nothing compared to Washington’s low opinion of you.”

Rural citizens and voters need and deserve representatives who understand the districts and constituents they strive to represent. After suffering for decades under federal and state rules and that have one everything from hindering access to broadband to hamstring our farmers, rural Virginians are starting to realize that most of the proposed “solutions” coming from politicians and bureaucrats are crafted to fix the damage that their programs did in the first place.

What rural Virginia needs are not supposedly altruistic solutions offered up by politicians who think they know better than us. This November, let’s elect representatives to Congress like Nick Freitas, who understand that the best way to revitalize rural Virginia is through greater freedom and liberty, and less government interference.

Freitas has earned my vote because he believes we should be the authors of our own destiny, rather than a footnote in some bureaucrat’s biography.

Christian Heiens


Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

I sit here an old man, a widower after 61 years of marriage and mourned premature death of two adult children—two heart attacks, diabetes and …

Post election, we’re all still here and somehow we need to get along. Do we really want to have two separate societies living cheek-to-jowl, neither speaking with and certainly not understanding the other? Is that really good for the nation’s civic health? (If you need a prompt, the correct answer is “no, it’s not.”)

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


Breaking News